"A scoring, a scoring for kissing us".Vvermut activists publicly denounced for their 800.000 Instagram followers to the Pub La Luna de Conil, in a couple of videos and some other publication, labeling the premises to launch all its hordes, thirsty for justice and equity.They said that they had suffered a homophobic aggression that consisted of the following: according to them, they threw them out of the bar because they were dancing to their roll, with two other friends, and a group "of uncles" did not stop looking at them like to flesh and laughof them "by lesbians".
The reader will allow me to paraphrase the story and the style.They complained to security, they say, but the insurance passed them.At one point they were already surrounding them 10 uncles in Barrera, turned for them, as in the zoo, and cornered them.They complained to a insurance, who made fun of them, in plan, Buá, and put himself on the part of the Maromos.There one of the Devermut stumbled a little like that back and touched an uncle, they say.The goalkeeper passed 10 villages, took her arm.But stronger!And another came and they lamented, in plan, that it cannot be, that we are lesbians, that we are not a fucking show.
(All this is counted on Instagram, where in addition to videos of political content, consisting of repeating the summary mantras of the gender master that both are in the University of Nebrija, they account for many of the details of their life, with photos where they areThey see them happy enjoying a cocktail, walking a dog, always great, in love, sometimes light of clothes, as in that video in which they come out painting some walls and the miniature is one of them, roller in hand, without a shirt,For example.Nothing is simply that I am laughing when two 'Instagramers' with 800.000 followers say they are not a show!).
But this does not justify that nobody bothers them in a disco, of course.And that is what they continue telling them, eating potatoes, sipping sorbets, spent on the moon of Conil.Despite their civilized complaints, Conil's men do not attend to reasons.There is a structure of oppression and an alliance and they are two poor defenseless bowling in a blue world.The "Kidnapping goalkeeper" (sic) was still emperoring to grab one of them.And the fact is that they are going to throw them away, instead of throwing the sluggling aggressors.And there the annoying uncles, who were basically humiliating them all the time, laugh, ha ha, and one of them stays looking at them, and when they face it, because there is no right, the lesbophobe macho tells them that they are doing “leave the face ”(sic).
In a matter of minutes, the Pub The Moon of Conil is under the inclement attack of the zombies that follow these two
From this, says one of the Devermut, while Masica Doritos, published a video "Without the audio, because the audio is a eager", and what is seen in the video is, indeed, a bearded guy who tries to grab the mobileWith that she is recording it, or to cover the camera, go to know.Meanwhile, the goalkeeper continues to harass them to leave."You are confusing yourself as a person," one of them communicates, "you are very lucky".It's a you don't know who you are talking to!of the Instagram era.
There comes the climax of this sad story that could happen in Kabul the same as in Conil."The turkey tries to hit me".They give details, the hand already "as if to hit", a "big uncle", etc..But there the security is put on the part of the testosterone because "uncles are protected between them".Total, that they throw them.They repeat later that everything has been because they looked at them, looked at them like a show, lascivious, as if they had not seen lesbians in their life, but they are not one of those "bowling alley that stay small", and they stand up, and of course, they are not accustomed.Violence in response.(Although violence, you will see below, it is not seen).
In summary: the lesbophobic patriarchy of Conil de la Frontera had won a battle, but not the war.Because to win the wars are 800.000 followers that they tell them all this, publishing some decontextualized video, and in a matter of minutes the Pub the Moon of Conil is under the inclement attack of the zombies that follow these two.Here would have ended the story that we have seen so many times, with the scrub and closed in the best of dreams brand ofvermut.In fact, the media were already filled with headlines about homophobic aggression in a Conil bar.Because the media are to eat separately.
Conil's moon has videos and publishes them to get rid of the purge, and threatens to denounce the two activists for defamations and slander
But suddenly, which exterminating angel, says the moon of Conil who has videos of the security cameras, and publishes them to get rid of the purge, and threatens to denounce the two activists for defamations and slander, and it turns out that in these videosIt looks, clear, that at least a good part of what the Vvermut tells - a fundamental part - is simply and lies.Neither surround them in a wall plan, nor one of them stumble.That is: at least, they adorn and exaggerate their sufferings.Which is what any victimist childhood does, by the way.
They convert the story of a light disco trifulca, which has no consequences and also seems to be caused at least by them, in a story of victimism and structural oppression.In the videos neither do uncles bother them, nor look them obsessively, but it is possible that it happened.Yes, something that the Vvermut takes out later (not in their first chronicle), when LGTB activists have already launched themselves against them by using the cause to make them little, and that is that one of the maromes of the confrontation,When the activist puts himself by his side and places the mobile in selfi mode to record with him, he tries to kiss his face, at which time a struggle begins.
The fact is that one of the waitresses (and here the alleged alliance of males no longer works) has said that they were the ones who were lying it, and looking for a fight.Between this testimony and the videos, the devermut have remained as fakers.When I write this they have lost more than 60.000 followers, they claim to be broken, consistent, and appeal to the solidarity of women and the 'I believe you'.And this is precisely what I came to talk about.
Vermut Justice
Vvermut defend a world that looks a lot like that, little by little, we see to settle on democracy and the rule of law.It is a world in which there is no presumption of innocence for those who are part of the supposed structure of oppression, that is, a #MeToo world in which the public accusation made by a woman or the member of a minority to unleashed a reaction is enoughAutomatic condemnation, first social, but thanks to Irene Montero you may soon be judicial.
In the justice ofvermut, Conil's night would have resulted in his story, glowing, and automatic punishment to the bar.There would be no lawyers for fear of disqualifications (macho, homophobic) against anyone who questioned the suffering testimony.To this would have followed a storm of repudiation, boycott and cancellation, and we would have seen many parasites, crazy to obtain their 'likes' based on comparing the pub the moon of Conil with the third Reich, adding to burning.If not for security recordings and the response from LGTB activism, things would have ended like this.
They may really feel violated by neighboring boys.But this, far from knocking on the enjundia, only makes the most interesting episode
In this story, of small and summer appearance, there are many elements that I have tried to write in recent years.My last book addresses them.It seems to me that it has everything, in fact, and that I am not convinced one hundred percent that everything the devermut say is a lie.Those next door might be sought insistently.They may lack respect. They may really feel violated by neighboring boys.But this, far from knocking on the enjundia, only makes the most interesting episode.You will see why.
The first key element is that, in a context of both individual and tribal narcissism, that is, of Instagram stars with syndrome of the 'oppressed people', of “all to one (but behind me, look at how much I suffer)”, anysomething that happens to someone can be perceived, interpreted and denounced by that person as an aggression, when it may not be.If we allow the feeling to completely encode what the aggression is, stripping it of objective elements, neither the videos nor the testimony of the PUD waitress remove so that the Devermut has attacked them.
The looks are, in the vast majority of cases, a bit inscrutable.And sensibilities can also be misleading
They speak a lot, in fact, about the looks.And in the last attempt of legal reform of our government for sexual aggressions, the "lascivious looks" appear among the forms of damage.But the looks belong, par excellence, the kingdom of subjectivity.They are made with an intention (sometimes, in fact, without any intention, involuntarily, as if the eyes were sovereign) and are then received, on the other hand, with a sensitivity.Intention and sensitivity are two swampy lands to explain what happened.Determine if a look was effectively lascivious is only possible in the kingdom of pantomime and exaggeration, as in the movies of Pajares and Esteso. The looks are, in the vast majority of cases, a bit inscrutable.And sensibilities can also be misleading.
It seems symptomatic that this whole case of the Devermut comes from the looks.Of the looks that two ladies supposedly receive with a particular relationship with the looks, because they do not stop publishing their photos on the network, and live from that.
But there is more.Because in a world that sells as postgraduate teaching what ends up being a gross catalog of micro -agrees imported from the cultural psychosis of the United States, including Calvinist and Puritano issue of 'dirty looks';In a world where millions of articles are written explaining women or minorities why they should feel hurt and offended all day;In a world where the fact of not feeling hurt by stupidity can be a symptom of worrying alienation, and where to top it up any victim testimony receives automatic awards, there are millions of ways to end justifying that those two bar inquisitors suffered an aggression.
Izal y la rebelión de las groupies (cómo destrozar la vida de un artista) Juan Soto IvarsThis leads us to the second element.If anything can be an aggression, provided that the victim belongs to one of the groups that seem to import the press, and provided that that person has felt it effectively, or ends up convincing himself that he felt like that, or says it for benefitOwn, or for damaging others (such as the 'vendetta' of Conil), then we must be tremendous with any accusation or story that is poured on social networks.In fact, for a narcissistic person, and on Instagram you are not going to find only one that is not, everything that does not come to ask for mouth is an aggression or a symptom of injustice.Remember the adorable stories of girls to which the waiter put coca-cola when they had asked beer, and told this as if someone had disrespected them severely.
What leads us to the third fund.Give it for granted that no complaint like this will be false and convert the testimony of one part into an automatic movement of punishment against the other is simply feudal.And I don't care what collective is everyone.If the accusations are sentences, anyone will be in the hands of the legion of permanently injured narcissists;Anyone can be dismissed or canceled, as in the United States, based on a partial testimony whose motivations are not always clear and on which one cannot ask;And any small minutia (such as the facts related to Devermut, even in the unlikely case that all this was as is) will become a crime against human rights.
Even if they had told the whole truth, anyone would have a right to condemn a Conil bar in the parallel justice courts of the networks
Here is the key to the matter.Not even in the event that the Devermut had told the whole truth, no one would have a right to destroy a conil drink bar, or condemn it unanimously in the parallel courts of justice of social networks.In the same way that the Vvermut should not be destroyed by that weapon that they use so many times, and that they are now put against them, it is other courts, the institutional ones, which are to settle these disagreements.There they will have to answer them from their possible slander, and pay their punishment, or denounce the premises that left them hel.Always based on objective tests, and not Tiktok videos.
If we allow this relativistic and subjectivist vision of crime, increasing.And then we will be lost.We, you and you.All.
